The anti-monopoly issues in the auto industry have recently culminated in the turmoil. Regardless of the manufacturers of penalized parts, the punishment of Audi and other vehicle manufacturers, and the punishment of the insurance industry, they have attracted a lot of attention. Recently, the two news stories have been very interesting and shared with you.
The first news is that the media reported that "the European and American Chambers of Commerce complained about the lack of legal system in anti-monopoly and sought to be rejected." In the initial overseas media, the issue of anti-monopoly in the automotive industry was discussed. After clarification, most of the enterprises that have been punished are foreign companies. This is because the local automobile manufacturing industry is too weak and weak. It is not sad whether we are lucky or not. However, the details of anti-monopoly talked by European and American businessmen, we deserve to ponder and improve the way of working, not because the starting point is correct, and let others criticize the way of execution.
The second news is that the media reported that the Shanghai Association has revised the auto insurance self-discipline convention to avoid monopoly. The Shanghai Insurance Association said that the legal background of the amendment is the Anti-Monopoly Law, the Anti-Price Monopoly Regulations, and the Insurance Industry. Further implement the relevant laws and regulations such as the Notice on Relevant Issues in the Anti-Monopoly Law. The meaning of this kind of self-disciplined instrument is really incomprehensible, giving people the illusion of a "guarantee". Using this situation to break the monopoly is like making a child write a guarantee without making mistakes. Is it obvious?
These two focuses, the author put together to talk about, the main reason is that we are implementing the right thing, probably because the corresponding execution process is not so familiar, so that from the working method or the rules, it is very active Things become very passive, and there are many aspects that may require us to improve.
First, the starting point is correct, and the implementation method needs to be improved. On September 9, when Premier Li Keqiang of the State Council and Tianjin participated in the dialogue with foreign business leaders at the 2014 Summer Davos Forum, World Economic Forum Chairman Schwab also expressed his opinion on the antitrust investigation. In doubt, Li Keqiang said that among the enterprises involved in the anti-monopoly investigation, foreign companies accounted for only 10%. He once again stressed that "these measures are not aimed at a certain type of enterprise, or are selective. The purpose is to create an environment that is loose, relaxed and fair to the enterprise."
Regarding the anti-monopoly of the auto industry, the author has also written about the situation before, especially several Japanese auto parts suppliers, in the United States because of the joint monopoly was given a huge fine, why only in China's anti-monopoly received doubts, and Not looking at the difference between the price of these parts and the foreign supply? These are obviously based on arguments to find arguments, not so-called objective justice.
Of course, the author talked about, we insist on anti-monopoly, which itself has no problem. The key to the problem is that the European and American Chamber of Commerce mentioned other issues. "Europe will generate 100-200 pages of reports after the anti-monopoly investigation is completed. Explain the process of investigation," but in China, it is regrettable that in the early stages of the investigation, a two-page conclusion was made.
This issue deserves our attention. We don't have to emulate how Europe and America are, but we need to understand how to ensure the credibility of the government and ensure a just environment. We can have our own independent legal system, which is based on giving anyone involved, Any enterprise that has a full defense right, we want to become a big country, this process is necessary to experience, and through this behavior to achieve a self-improvement and promotion.
Second, perfecting the construction and implementation of anti-monopoly law seems to be very necessary for the author. If it is similar to Confucianism, Taoism, and Legalism in the past, the author is more inclined to the legalist. Nowadays, the society is developing rapidly. It is not feasible to rely solely on morality to constrain. The whole society will be chaotic. We only need to set the corresponding rules scientifically, and then through this effort, let us more people or things to obey, and then enter an orderly Process, these are enough.
Regarding the use of "self-discipline" to solve industry monopolies, this is more like a statement without any practical meaning. If self-discipline can be self-disciplined, monopoly will not happen, just if it is useful if you are sorry, what should the police do? We are not only arrogant because of self-discipline and other instruments, but we should improve the corresponding laws and regulations and carry out more necessary implementations. This result is more practical.
Third, the auto industry's thorough anti-monopoly is to sort out the industry rules. At the beginning of the anti-monopoly of the auto industry, the author talked about this issue, which talked about the change of expectations, and then saw someone writing about my point, talking about the car brand. The management method is consistent with Europe and the United States and should not be changed. The author believes that this is not reasonable.
The development of our industry and the country can learn some advanced mature experience, but it is not to follow these rules. Now the whole industry is changing in the form of some things. Some things have no experience to emulate. For example, we talk about car e-commerce, for example, We talked about the abnormal zero ratio, for example, we talked about car driverless technology and car intelligence. There is no experience to explore these aspects. Under such circumstances, we should learn how to improve the development of the whole industry. Let some things with good prospects break through the bottleneck and these are the key points.
For example, let the original parts can directly enter the after-sales circulation market, and let more unlicensed brand after-sales enterprises enter the legal after-sales field. These aspects can reduce the circulation of goods, avoid the monopoly and loss of profits, and of course reduce the zero. It is a clear fact that it is more than a consumer. If you still say that other countries have not done so, we should not do this. It seems a bit ridiculous.
In addition, we talked about the car e-commerce, everyone is like "the emperor is not anxious too urgent" situation, how to solve the bottleneck problem inside? If the issue of authorized after-sales is not resolved, how can there be a revolutionary car e-commerce, if the car manufacturer has maintained the entire control, how can other peripheral players enter the field, convenient car selection, car e-commerce It is impossible to appear, especially the direct conflict between the return and exchange of the Internet and the three bags of the car. How to balance these. The bottleneck problem is not solved. Other e-commerce companies may be more similar to a kind of marketing form of vassal. Therefore, it is very necessary to use this anti-monopoly to reorganize the industry rules.
V-Shape Notch Mold,V-Shape Notch Cutting Die,Cathode V-Shape Notch Cutting Mold,Cathode V-Shape Notch Punch Mould
Guangdong Rixin Precision Technology Co., Ltd. , https://www.nissontooling.com